VERY ROUGH TRANSCRIPT:
Create what she described last night as a Frankenstein a weapon. She writes that she has firsthand knowledge of the Chinese military has a template virus with cut sites designed for that very purpose. Once again, we can verify this but it’s clear that Dr. Lehman yang is a serious person and making a serious claim. So within a few hours of her interview a video of the segment reached 3.1 million people on Facebook. And why wouldn’t it, the Coronavirus pandemic has touched the life of every American. Justifiably people want to know where it came from. But Facebook still doesn’t want you to know that microsoft betriebssystem herunterladen. So Facebook suppressed a video supposedly on behalf of the Chinese government. It was harder for users to watch the segment and those who found the video had to navigate a warning of the interview that “Repeats information about Covid-19 that independent fact-checkers say is false. Instagram, which Facebook also owns does the same thing. He did not explain why. Nor did the tech companies explain why they would know more about disease transmission that an MD phd for virologist like Dr. Lehman yang. Instead Facebook and Instagram linked to three so-called fact checks which supposedly proved yang was lying. If you click on the provided links you notice something odd. The fact checks were all published months ago, many months in January, February, March and they had nothing whatsoever to do with what he he said on her show bingokaarten dead 20 download. In fact they wrote, does anyone know who she was. The other is a completely unrelated claim, that the virus was patented. No one will tell us that. The truth is, and you know it if you watched carefully. Experts have been wrong frequently throughout the pandemic and at one point they told us not to wear masks and now they tell us we must. They have changed their prescriptions many times. Most of them are not bad people come up most of them are trying their best but they are human beings and they are also fallible and make mistakes. The solution to this age-old problem can be used to understand that intuitively is more informed voice in the conversation and that’s how you make wise decisions and that’s how you get to the truth. Diversity of view. Facebook doesn’t believe that, they believe in censorship. Censorship does not make us wiser and does not make us better informed ganze alben kostenlosen legal. If it did we would be speaking Russian right now, the Soviet Union would run the world and it would have worked. And the collapse under the weight of its own absurdities. Absurdity is abetted by censorship. Anything built on lies falls apart over time. Anything that stands on the way of the power must be crushed. Mark Zuckerberg explained that any challenges to the party line on Coronavirus will be censored immediately. Also other misinformation that may lead to imminent risk of physical harm, and misinformation can’t be allowed to spread to our system, Zuckerberg declared. So what exactly may you be wondering constitutes this information? What the definition of that? In practice, misinformation according to Facebook as anything, and anything that embraces Big Tech allies in the communist government of China videos herunterladen youtube online. Information like that is misinformation and must be censored, not for your benefit, it doesn’t help you at all, but for theirs. To solidify their power. So in July Facebook and Twitter took home a video on the new site Breitbart of practicing physicians and front-line doctors pointing out that Hydroxychloroquine could help Coronavirus patients. Listen carefully to what the doctor say in this video.
>> This is a treatment regimen that is very simple and should be in the hands of the American people. The difficult aspect of this is that at the moment because of Politics it’s being blocked from doctors prescribing it and it’s being blocked from pharmacists releasing it sims 4 free download windows. They’ve been in power to overrule the doctors opinion. I am in favor of it being over the counter. Give it to the people.
>> That’s true. Authorities are pro-choice when it comes to Hydroxychloroquine, but they spoke declared that they could not be allowed, because those claims constituted and that in itself was dangerous information. Researchers at Henry Ford health system in southeast Michigan found that early administration of Hydroxychloroquine made hospitalized patients substantially less likely to die. These are not politicians or tech executives, they are physicians enough what they found an equitable practice. But none of that mattered to the 25-year-old humanities major, major, they decided you absently could not see that video because it questioned the status quo karaton appen. But in a way, in doing that and censoring that information, it was dangerous. To the same elites that give it to the people. Nothing could be more dangerous to Silicon Valley than democratizing access to the truth which is something they believe they have been a Monopoly on. Alphabet which owns the search engine Google, a Monopoly if they ever was one, is even more protective of its complete stranglehold on information, which it has. In April they took down a video from Dr. Dan Erickson. He said he was being pressured to indicate that patients were dying of Coronavirus when in fact they died because of other causes. Many physicians have said that. He also cast doubt on the need for universal social distancing.
>> We aren’t pressured to test for flu word herunterladen rub. But why is that, why are we being pressured to add Covid to maybe increase the numbers and make it look a little bit worse than it is? I think so.
>> Tucker: This is a physician practicing medicine. Count the number of lectures. Between a woman and her doctor, not in this case. You can’t see that. If they are willing to take that off the Internet, if they are willing to censor that and prevent you from seeing it, but will he do with the election results a month and a half from now? YouTube so the video that you just saw must be censored because it explicitly disputed the efficacy of local health authority recommended guidance. Notice they didn’t even bother trying to clean that Dr. Erickson was saying something false. No. They just said contrary to guidance from unnamed bureaucrats in the government. Talk about state media this is what state media looks like youtube musiker kostenlos herunterladen. Demanding that you must believe some unelected bureaucrats from the state, taking his word over of practicing physicians word. Recently YouTube censored a video from Dr. Scott Atlas, and it Dr. Atlas argued that maybe we don’t need universal social distancing measures. Some groups of Americans are not in great danger, and that is obviously true. No serious scientist disputes the accuracy of that statement. But then Dr. Atlas did what you can absently not do ever in this brave new world they’ve created. He pointed out that statistical models, the technocrats use to justify their’s existence have been catastrophically wrong.
>> The policymakers in general, they put in a locked down didn’t care at all, they did not look at all at the consequences of the lockdown with which app you can instagram profile pictures. They used hypothetical projection models that were so egregiously wrong, far, far off, yet they keep citing those models.
>> Even now?
>> Even now. So the extension of the lockdown is the problem.
>> Tucker: So this is why that should scare you. That was not allowed by our tech overlords and yet no one disputes what Dr. Atlas said in the clip you just saw was true. Look it up and verify it, assuming you are still allowed to. Because it is true, we will continue to say it and things like it. Fox News believes in free speech and we plan to exercise hours because unlike the majority of America’s news in America we are not beholden to Facebook and YouTube for our revenue herunterladen. As long as that’s true we will let you report and you decide. Dr. Scott Atlas is here. Thank you so much for coming on. Let me ask you a broad question to start. What does it do to the practice of science when certain areas of inquiry are off limits or censored?