Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

2016 Election2020 ElectionMedia BiasNew YorkNews/OpinionPresident Trump

Man Featured by New York Times as Disgruntled Trump Voter Never Voted For Trump

The New York Times quietly corrected a pair of articles mentioning a Trump voter with buyer’s remorse after it was discovered he never actually cast a vote for the President.

Mark Graham, a resident of Erie County, Pennsylvania, was initially featured in a video created by America Bridge, a Democrat PAC.

“I voted for Donald Trump in 2016 because I thought he would make a change,” Graham says in the spot.

When questioned about whether or not Trump has delivered on that change, Graham replies, “Not for the good” because the President “plays favorites for people like himself … He doesn’t understand life around here.”

Do you support Joe Biden as president?

 

He added, “Voting for Donald Trump in 2020 would be like putting gasoline on a fire.”

One news organization happened to check Graham’s voting record and discovered he didn’t cast a ballot for Trump. In fact, he didn’t vote at all in 2016.

 

New York Times Embarrassed

You’d expect Democrat PACs to run dishonest videos in an effort to drive their voter base to the polls. You might even expect the local media to fail in their due diligence to run a background check on people they feature in their stories.

But the New York Times? The New York freakin’ Times?

That’s exactly what happened, as the newspaper of record ran two articles – one, an in-depth feature on Graham, another that references him – which tried to push the buyer’s remorse angle of former Trump voters.

In both pieces, the Times was forced to issue a correction.

“After this article was published, local news media reported that Mark Graham, a voter featured in the American Bridge ad campaign and another article by The Times, did not vote in the 2016 election,” they wrote. “The Times has confirmed those reports.”

Pro-tip: Maybe confirm his comments and what he claims to be prior to running multiple articles on him.

 

A Pattern Emerges

We’d like to say this kind of thing by the New York Times is a rarity, but it isn’t.

In December of 2016, the Times was forced to issue a correction on a column regarding the Electoral College. They claimed to have opposed the Electoral College consistently for 80 years, only to have a column from 2000 surface titled The Case for the Electoral College.

This past January, they had to issue a significant correction to a story that seemed to insinuate proven collusion between former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort and the Kremlin.

And perhaps most famously of late, the Times was forced to retract an editorial that blamed Sarah Palin for a mass shooting in Arizona in 2011, a conspiracy theory that was debunked almost immediately after the heinous act was carried out.

Palin sued the New York Times for defamation over the ‘fake news’ reporting in 2017, and the case was revived recently after a decision in her favor.

Perhaps if they stopped concluding that all Republicans are bad before reporting, and gathered facts instead, they could restore their image.

Until then, the only appropriate place for the New York Times is at the bottom of a garbage can.

Read more at the Political Insider

Rusty Weiss

Rusty Weiss is a freelance journalist focusing on the conservative movement and its political agenda. He has been writing conservatively charged articles for several years in the upstate New York area, and his writings have appeared in the Daily Caller, American Thinker, FoxNews.com, Big Government, the Times Union, and the Troy Record. He is also Editor of one of the top conservative blogs of 2012, the Mental Recession.

Related Articles

8 Comments

  1. Have you ever thought about writing an ebook or guest authoring on other websites? I have a blog centered on the same ideas you discuss and would love to have you share some stories/information. I know my audience would enjoy your work. If you are even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an email.

  2. Hey, I simply hopped over to your web page via StumbleUpon. No longer something I would normally learn, but I liked your thoughts none the less. Thank you for making something price reading.

  3. This is indeed my blue ribbon things sound here, indeed appropriate looking weblog. I discovered a karma of fascinating obstruct within your blog noticeably it’s discussion. From all the comments on your articles, it appears like this is in all honesty a completely well-liked network site. Store up the telling function. .Thank you respecting another mammoth article. Where else could anyone win that stripe of tidings in such a execute custom of writing? I be undergoing a presenting next week, and I am on the look an eye to such information. Hasta Bakicisi Bebek Bakicisi Yasli Bakicisi Cocuk Bakicisi

  4. Can i post on your blog as well? I`m reading your posts since few monts and i think you`ve got amazing blog. Lot`s of interesting things and nice theme If you want to give me an access write me by e-mail.

  5. Hey there, I think your blog might be having browser compatibility issues. When I look at your website in Safari, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other then that, great blog!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button