Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

CorruptionCrimeDemocratsNews/OpinionPresident Trump

Judge Napolitano Suggests Anti-Trump Jury Foreperson in Roger Stone Trial Could Be Charged

Judge Andrew Napolitano commented on the remarkable revelations coming out of the Roger Stone trial, namely that the jury foreperson had a significant anti-Trump and anti-Stone bias.

Facts regarding Tomeka Hart, the juror in question, have been coming out of late, facts that probably should have been known by the judge or prosecutors in the case long before now.

Hart, it has been revealed, donated to Democrat candidates rather frequently (she donated $100 to Kamala Harris during the trial), actually ran for Congress as a Democrat, posted on social media that supporters of the President are racists, and even shared a post mocking Stone for decrying the ‘excessive force’ used in his arrest.

“Then stop being racists,” she wrote in response to one article about Trump supporters growing weary of being called the term.

“Co-signing and defending a racist and his racist rhetoric makes you racist,” Hart continued. “Point blank.”

Could not load the poll.

Which begs the question, how in the hell was this woman, who very clearly has an animus towards Stone and anybody involved with President Trump, allowed to serve on the jury period, much less as foreperson?

Napolitano has some opinions and if they’re right, suggests Hart could be looking at being charged with a crime.


Did She Hide Her Bias?

Judge Napolitano appeared with Fox News personality Tucker Carlson to discuss the case which has ignited Democrats to pursue new impeachment charges and investigations against the President and Attorney General Bill Barr.

“Why was someone like this allowed to remain on the jury?” Carlson asked.

Hart, Napolitano believes, has a very serious problem if it is determined that she intentionally hid her bias.

“This is information that she must have hidden from the lawyers and the judge who interrogated her before she was put on the jury,” he explained, noting that federal cases require a judge interrogate the jurors.

“The purpose of the interrogation is to weed out people that have a bias, prejudice, and knowledge of case or interest in the outcome,” Napolitano continued.

“She obviously had a prejudice against Roger Stone, a bias in favor of his prosecution, and an interest in seeing him convicted.”

There is another scenario though less likely – that the judge and prosecutors knew of Hart’s mindset and were okay with it.


Bring Her Back In roger stone trial

The reality is, in most courts in America this would be grounds for a mistrial.

Napolitano believes the judge in this trial needs to bring Hart back in, along with the prosecutors who recently attempted to resign in protest over perceived interference by the President, and interrogate her again.

If it is determined Hart lied about bias or prior knowledge of Stone in her initial interrogation, said Napolitano, “It would be catastrophic for her.”

“First of all, she is a lawyer,” he said. “So she would be prosecuted for perjury since the statements are given under oath.”

“And if convicted she would lose her license to practice law but that would be the least of her concerns,” Napolitano continued. “She probably would serve jail time if she lied in order to affect the outcome of a case.”

He also proposed that if it is determined that Hart falsely represented herself, the conviction would be vacated and a new trial ordered.

Considering Democrats are hell-bent on taking down President Trump and AG Bill Barr over this, imagine their rage when one of their own resistance footsoldiers ends up getting Stone off.

Read more at the Political Insider roger stone trial

Rusty Weiss

Rusty Weiss is a freelance journalist focusing on the conservative movement and its political agenda. He has been writing conservatively charged articles for several years in the upstate New York area, and his writings have appeared in the Daily Caller, American Thinker,, Big Government, the Times Union, and the Troy Record. He is also Editor of one of the top conservative blogs of 2012, the Mental Recession.

Related Articles


  1. Wonderful article. Thanks a whole lot for the breakdown you have given here. I am just still sort-of an illiterate about this topic. So this publication was really helpful to myself. My husband just launched his own ebook in this area and I think some things learned from your publication would enable everyone of us to give him the required support. Thanks!

  2. Thanks for your write-up. What I want to point out is that while looking for a good internet electronics shop, look for a website with comprehensive information on critical indicators such as the personal privacy statement, security details, any payment procedures, and other terms in addition to policies. Constantly take time to look into the help along with FAQ areas to get a far better idea of how a shop functions, what they are capable of doing for you, and just how you can make use of the features.

  3. I recently noticed your website back i are generally looking through which on a daily basis. You’ve got a loads of information at this site so i actually like your look to the web a tad too. Maintain the best show results!

  4. After study a number of the content on your own internet site now, and I genuinely much like your technique of blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark site list and you will be checking back soon. Pls look into my site also and make me aware how you feel.

  5. Resources such as the one you mentioned here will be extremely helpful to myself! Ill publish a hyperlink to this web page on my personal blog. Im certain my site visitors will discover that very useful.

  6. Hi there, You’ve done an excellent job. I will definitely digg it and personally suggest to my friends.

    I am sure they’ll be benefited from this web site.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button