A three-judge panel on the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit sided unanimously Monday with the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, the Orthodox Jewish group Agudath Israel of America, and two synagogues, in their lawsuit against Cuomo.
At issue was the number of people that could attend religious gatherings. The religious houses argued that Cuomo had unfairly targeted them with arbitrary rules while other businesses deemed essential could remain open and without restriction.
“The restrictions challenged here specially and disproportionately burden religious exercise,” wrote Circuit Judge Michael Park, an appointee of President Trump.
“We conclude that [Cuomo’s] Order discriminates against religion on its face.”
It’s Cuomo and his ilk who are the disgusting dictatorshttps://t.co/KOTerotthY
— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) December 29, 2020
Cuomo’s Lockdown Orders Unfairly Target Religious Gatherings
The ruling by the Second Circuit comes about a month after the Supreme Court issued a temporary injunction blocking Cuomo’s efforts to limit religious gatherings during the pandemic.
Justice Neil Gorsuch, another appointee of President Trump, said in his concurring opinion that the government “is not free to disregard the First Amendment in times of crisis.”
“There is no world in which the Constitution tolerates color-coded executive edicts that reopen liquor stores and bike shops but shutter churches, synagogues and mosques,” he wrote.
Cuomo, at the time, dismissed the Supreme Court’s ruling as “moot” and “irrelevant,” claiming the restrictions had been lifted in the areas in question.
Still, the court opined that the restrictions “strike at the very heart of the First Amendment’s guarantee of religious liberty,” and that “even in a pandemic, the Constitution cannot be put away and forgotten.”
Justice Barrett Casts Deciding Vote, Gorsuch Destroys Cuomo | Law & Crime https://t.co/8K9yLlSOYv
— Janice Dean (@JaniceDean) November 26, 2020
Gabbard Tears Into the Lockdown Edicts
Former Democrat presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard offered praise for the Supreme Court decision which blocked Cuomo’s anti-religion lockdown rules.
“While COVID may temporarily require certain public health restrictions, houses of worship MUST be treated same as secular institutions—not more harshly/strictly,” she said, a direct shot at Governor Cuomo.
I strongly support this Supreme Court ruling defending our First Amendment/freedom of religion. While COVID may temporarily require certain public health restrictions, houses of worship MUST be treated same as secular institutions—not more harshly/strictly.https://t.co/PD2ztczYrD
— Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 (@TulsiGabbard) November 30, 2020
As for Monday’s ruling, a lawyer for one of the plaintiff’s predicted the decision would extend beyond just COVID restrictions.
“It is a clear statement … that government can’t disfavor religious conduct merely because it sees no value in religious practice,” they said.
While Cuomo views these rulings as irrelevant, ensuring freedom and religion for all – even during a pandemic – is anything but. And restricting those freedoms is unconstitutional.
Read more at the Political Insider