The Facts: democrats impeachment sham

PRESIDENT TRUMP’S LAWYERS HAVE SLAMMED THE DEMOCRATS’ IMPEACHMENT TEAM FOR MAKING A MOCKERY OF THE IMPEACHMENT PROCESS

President Trump’s attorney Jay Sekulow called out Democrats’ politically driven impeachment hypocrisy and blasted them for trying to “shred the Constitution.”

Sekulow: Democrats’ impeachment “violates the Constitution of the
United States.”

Sekulow stated that “policy disputes are not what the founders had in mind” as a reason for impeachment.

Sekulow criticized the Democrats call for impeachment calling it “dangerous for our republic.”

White House Counsel Pat Cipollone slammed hypocritical Democrats’ “farce” impeachment saying: “You owe an apology to the American people.”

Cipollone: Democrats are “trying to remove President Trump’s name from the ballot” through impeachment herunterladen.

Cipollone: Democrats are “not here to steal one election, they’re here to steal two elections.”

Is Trump going to win in 2020?

PRESIDENT TRUMP’S LEGAL TEAM AND REPUBLICANS HAVE MADE IT OVERWHELMINGLY CLEAR THERE IS NO CASE FOR IMPEACHMENT

Deputy White House Counsel Mike Purpura: “The key facts are undisputed…there was no quid pro quo for anything.”

Counsel Sekulow: Impeachment witnesses have agreed that America’s Ukraine policy got “stronger” under President Trump.

Rep. Elise Stefanik: The Democrats case is “so flimsy that they’re scrambling at this point.”

Rep video download mobile phone. Jim Jordan: The “facts will never change no matter how long Jerry Nadler and Adam Schiff talk.”

Fox News’s Chris Wallace criticized Adam Schiff stating that he “completely misrepresented” the truth.

Former House Intelligence Chairman Mike Rogers (R-AL): Democrats’ case was “disjointed” and filled with “flowery language that isn’t evidence.”

REMEMBER, WE’VE HEARD FROM ALL THE WITNESSES; THEY’VE MADE IT EXPLICITLY CLEAR THERE WAS NO QUID PRO QUO UNDERMINING THE CRUX OF THE DEMOCRATS ARGUMENT AGAINST THE PRESIDENT

Witness Tim Morrison said nothing concerned him about the July 25th 
phone call herunterladen.

Witness Gordon Sondland said the President never told him about preconditions for anything.

Sondland explained how “no one on this planet” told him that  Ukraine aid was tied to investigations ticket download german bahn.

Witness David Hale testified that he had no knowledge of strings attached to the Ukraine aid.

Hale said he was not aware of any connection between the Ukraine
aid and investigations herunterladen.

On multiple occasions, Former Ambassador Yovanovitch emphasized she had no firsthand information relating to the whistleblower complaint or the events surrounding the actual impeachment inquiry.

U.S. Envoy Kirk Volker said he received no “indication whatsoever or anything that resembled a quid pro quo” and that he was never involved in anything “considered to be bribery.”

Director for European Affairs on the National Security Council Alexander Vindman testified that he cannot remember any Ukrainian ever mentioning any pressure to do investigations how to download movies.

LIKEWISE, WITNESSES DURING THE IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY MADE CLEAR THE PRESIDENT’S SUPPORT FOR UKRAINE WAS HEAD AND SHOULDERS ABOVE THE SUPPORT GIVEN DURING THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

The Defense Department’s Laura Cooper said she was proud of how supportive the Trump administration has been to Ukraine.

Despite Democrat obfuscation, Yovanovitch detailed how President Trump strengthened Ukraine’s position with the sale of Javelin missiles on several occasions sesamstrasse.

Both Cooper and Hale testified that Trump provided Javelins to Ukraine when the Obama administration refused.

Vindman testified that President Trump provided important Javelin missiles to Ukraine when the Obama Administration had not herunterladen.

Both Hill and Holmes agreed that Javelins are an “important strategic deterrent” in Ukraine.

Volker testified that President Trump’s policy on Ukraine fundamentally turned U.S navi herunterladen. policy around after Obama.

CNN’S Scott Jennings: “The discussion of lethal assistance reminded many that Obama refused to give it for TWO YEARS after Russia invaded.”

INADVERTENTLY, THE DEMOCRATS’ WITNESSES ALSO MADE CLEAR THAT MAJOR QUESTIONS ABOUT CORRUPTION INVOLVING BURISMA AND THE BIDENS REMAIN

While Democrats struggled to find any shred of evidence, their witnesses spoke about the concerns they raised concerning Hunter Biden and Burisma.

Both Vindman and State Department Employee Jennifer Williams testified that Hunter Biden and Bursima had the “appearance of conflict of interest.”

Vindman testified that Burisma had a “pattern of questionable dealings & questions about corruption.”

Vindman testified that the President was “certainly” within his right to ask for investigations into corruption netflix film herunterladen.

Yovanovitch testified multiple times concerning Burisma and the Bidens, including disclosing that the FBI had investigated Burisma and that she had been prepped by the Obama Administration on how to respond to questions involving the company and the Bidens.

Even MSNBC’s Chris Matthews: “Who doesn’t think” there’s a “serious” appearance of Biden and Burisma conflict of interest.

Via the Republican National Committee democrats impeachment sham democrats impeachment sham