Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

News/Opinion

Arkansas Governor Just Signed Near-Total Abortion Ban Into Law

Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson has signed into law a near-total abortion ban, one of the most pro-life measures in the nation.

Hutchinson, who signed the legislation on Tuesday, cited his “long-held pro-life convictions” as reasoning for passing the law.

It restricts abortion to cases in which the life of the mother is in peril due to a medical emergency. It does not, however, include exceptions for rape or incest.

Hutchinson, in announcing he would sign the bill into law, expressed his concerns about those cases not being allowed as exceptions.

Were President Trump's four years in office a success?

 

“I would have preferred the legislation to include the exceptions for rape and incest, which has been my consistent view,” he said.

“We must abolish abortion in this nation just as we abolished slavery in the 19th century – all lives matter,” Republican state Sen. Jason Rapert, the bill’s sponsor said.

 

The Arkansas Abortion Law Is Meant to Force a Challenge to Roe V. Wade

The Arkansas abortion bans were created by pro-life Republicans seeking to force the Supreme Court to revisit its 1973 Roe vs. Wade decision legalizing abortion nationwide.

“Conservatives believe the court is more open to striking down the decision following former President Donald Trump’s three appointments to the court,” ABC News reports.

Hutchinson added in his statement, “SB6 is in contradiction of binding precedents of the U.S. Supreme Court, but it is the intent of the legislation to set the stage for the Supreme Court overturning current case law.”

The earliest the law can go into effect would be this summer, though abortion advocates have already said they’d challenge it in court prior to that.

 

Chances of Roe v. Wade Being Overturned

Hutchinson has previously shared with the legislature a letter written by an attorney for National Right to Life which predicted the chances of this bill leading to Roe being overturned were “very small and remote.”

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett has not ruled specifically on abortion in the past, but her writings in a 2013 Texas Law Review article give a brief glance into whether she might consider a review of Roe.

“Public response to controversial cases like Roe reflects public rejection of the proposition that [precedent] can declare a permanent victor in a divisive constitutional struggle rather than desire that the precedent remain forever unchanging,” she wrote.

 

Former President Trump suggested that Barrett’s appointment to the court could make a review of the landmark abortion case “certainly possible.”

Read more at the Political Insider

Rusty Weiss

Rusty Weiss is a freelance journalist focusing on the conservative movement and its political agenda. He has been writing conservatively charged articles for several years in the upstate New York area, and his writings have appeared in the Daily Caller, American Thinker, FoxNews.com, Big Government, the Times Union, and the Troy Record. He is also Editor of one of the top conservative blogs of 2012, the Mental Recession.

Related Articles

Back to top button