A short bio of a relatively unknown Barack Obama written in 1991, includes statements that the soon-to-be President was “born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii”, thus revealing the fact that his literary agents were extremist, right-wing birthers.

Via Breitbart.com,

Breitbart News has obtained a promotional booklet produced in 1991 by Barack Obama’s then-literary agency, Acton & Dystel, which touts Obama as “born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii.” 

The booklet, which was distributed to “business colleagues” in the publishing industry, includes a brief biography of Obama among the biographies of eighty-nine other authors represented by Acton & Dystel. 

It also promotes Obama’s anticipated first book, Journeys in Black and White–which Obama abandoned, later publishing Dreams from My Father instead.

The biography reads (image below):

Barack Obama, the first African-American president of the Harvard Law Review, was born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii.  The son of an American anthropologist and a Kenyan finance minister, he attended Columbia University and worked as a financial journalist and editor for Business International Corporation.   He served as project coordinator in Harlem for the New York Public Interest Research Group, and was Executive Director of the Developing Communities Project in Chicago’s South Side. His commitment to social and racial issues will be evident in his first book, Journeys in Black and White.

As is to be expected, the liberals have decided to attack the messenger, prompting a special note from management explaining that the editors at Breitbart are not birthers.  This, instead of asking the obvious question here – why did the publishers of this bio and/or the writer (possibly Obama himself) believe the information to be accurate?
iOwnTheWorld vehemently opposes the explanation from the Breitbart team, saying that they are tiptoeing around their own findings for fear of being labeled ignorant birthers themselves.

I’m getting a little sick of this bending over backwards to not appear “stupid” by these “high profile blogs” on the right. And unfortunately that must include Breitbart.com.

I’m not a “birther” either, in that, I don’t spend all of my time hunting down tips, leads, clues or evidence that Obama’s birth record, birth father, and life story is a lie. But I don’t ridicule the people who do that work.

How can Breitbart.com simultaneously say, we have a document that says Obama was born in Kenya, produced by Obama’s agents, and the printer says that the information was “probably” verified by the authors themselves, but then say that this doesn’t, at all, put the birth certificate’s veracity into question? Why is that?

As the Daily Caller reports, the problem of birtherism is a direct result of Obama’s supporters presenting misleading or contradictory information to the public.
“Obama and his handlers have a history of redefining his identity when expedient … [and] Obama has been known frequently to fictionalize aspects of his own life,” said the Breitbart website, which stressed its management’s disagreement with claims that Obama was actually born oversees.
The so-called “birther” point of view was, ironically, kept alive in 2008 by Obama supporters who slammed reporters investigating the issue, restricted access to his birth certificate and spent heavily to defeat lawsuits seeking a judicial investigation of the issue. 

Since 2008, Obama himself has kept alive the question of where he was born, partly by making jokes about it in speeches and fundraisers. His campaign has also sold Obama-themed products showing his birth certificate.

The answer doesn’t really matter, but what does it say about media today that they won’t even ask the question?  At the very least, prove that either the literary agents or Obama himself lied about his bio in order to sell books.  If you’re willing to research Mitt Romney’s high school antics, why are you not equally interested in a sitting President’s past history?

Anyway, now back to the economy…